Paper detail

Investigation of magnetocaloric effect: Stoner approximation vs DMFT

A comparative study of the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) in metals within the single-band Hubbard model on the face-centered cubic (fcc) lattice using both mean-field (Stoner) approximation (MFA) and dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) is done. The MCE is investigated in the case of second order magnetic phase transition from ferromagnet to paramagnet. To ensure presence of itinerant ferromagnetism in the Hubbard model the special case of spectrum parameters generating giant van Hove singularity at the bottom of the band is considered, while the Fermi level $E_{\rm f}$ is in the vinicity of the band bottom. To compare MCE within MFA and DMFT temperature dependence of magnetization, total energy and finally entropy for a set of Coulomb interactions $U$ at zero and finite values of magnetic field $h$ for both methods were performed. Also one of the MCE potentials, isothermal entropy change, as a function of temperature $ΔS (T)$ for both MFA and DMFT is calculated. In the MFA, the expected maximum value of $ΔS (T)$ at the Curie temperature $T_C$ ($ΔS_{\rm max}$) quite significantly decreases while $U$ grows. Similar but much weaker decreasing of $ΔS_{\rm max}$ is found for DMFT results. The account of local quantum fluctuations results in larger values of $ΔS_{\rm max}$ within DMFT than within MFA. A peak width of $ΔS (T)$ at half height is approximately the same for both methods. Another effect of DMFT local quantum fluctuations is the destruction of anomalous Curie temperature $T_C$ dependence on $U$ present in MFA, which is invoked by an effect of giant van Hove singularity. However the relative cooling power (RCP) is very close in DMFT and MFA for the same model parameters and goes down upon $U$ increase.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

Investigation of magnetocaloric effect: Stoner approximation vs DMFT | BZPEER | BZPEER