Paper detail

Investigating the Cost of Anonymity on Dynamic Networks

In this paper we study the difficulty of counting nodes in a synchronous dynamic network where nodes share the same identifier, they communicate by using a broadcast with unlimited bandwidth and, at each synchronous round, network topology may change. To count in such setting, it has been shown that the presence of a leader is necessary. We focus on a particularly interesting subset of dynamic networks, namely \textit{Persistent Distance} - ${\cal G}($PD$)_{h}$, in which each node has a fixed distance from the leader across rounds and such distance is at most $h$. In these networks the dynamic diameter $D$ is at most $2h$. We prove the number of rounds for counting in ${\cal G}($PD$)_{2}$ is at least logarithmic with respect to the network size $|V|$. Thanks to this result, we show that counting on any dynamic anonymous network with $D$ constant w.r.t. $|V|$ takes at least $D+ Ω(\text{log}\, |V| )$ rounds where $Ω(\text{log}\, |V|)$ represents the additional cost to be payed for handling anonymity. At the best of our knowledge this is the fist non trivial, i.e. different from $Ω(D)$, lower bounds on counting in anonymous interval connected networks with broadcast and unlimited bandwith.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.