Paper detail

Invertible mappings and the large deviation theory for the $q$-maximum entropy principle

The possibility of reconciliation between canonical probability distributions obtained from the $q$-maximum entropy principle with predictions from the law of large numbers when empirical samples are held to the same constraints, is investigated into. Canonical probability distributions are constrained by both: $(i)$ the additive duality of generalized statistics and $(ii)$ normal averages expectations. Necessary conditions to establish such a reconciliation are derived by appealing to a result concerning large deviation properties of conditional measures. The (dual) $q^*$-maximum entropy principle is shown {\bf not} to adhere to the large deviation theory. However, the necessary conditions are proven to constitute an invertible mapping between: $(i)$ a canonical ensemble satisfying the $q^*$-maximum entropy principle for energy-eigenvalues $\varepsilon_i^*$, and, $(ii)$ a canonical ensemble satisfying the Shannon-Jaynes maximum entropy theory for energy-eigenvalues $\varepsilon_i$. Such an invertible mapping is demonstrated to facilitate an \emph{implicit} reconciliation between the $q^*$-maximum entropy principle and the large deviation theory. Numerical examples for exemplary cases are provided.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.