Paper detail

Inverse Z-spectrum analysis for MT- and spillover-corrected and T1-compensated steady-state pulsed CEST-MRI - application to pH-weighted MRI of acute stroke

Endogenous chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) effects are always diluted by competing effects such as direct water proton saturation (spillover) and macromolecular magnetization transfer (MT). This leads to T2-and MT-shine-through effects in the actual biochemical contrast of CEST. Therefore, a simple evaluation algorithm which corrects the CEST signal was searched for. By employing a recent eigenspace theory valid for spinlock and continuous wave (cw) CEST we predict that the inverse Z-spectrum is beneficial to Z-spectrum itself. Based on this we propose a new spillover- and MT-corrected magnetization transfer ratio (MTRRex) yielding Rex, the exchange dependent relaxation rate in the rotating frame. For verification, the amine proton exchange of creatine in solutions with different agar concentration was studied experimentally at clinical field strength of 3T. In contrast to the compared standard evaluation for pulsed CEST experiments, MTRasym, our approach shows no T2 or MT shine through effect. We demonstrate that spillover can be corrected properly and also quantitative evaluation of pH and creatine concentration is possible which proves MTRRex as quantitative CEST-MRI method. A spillover correction is of special interest for clinical static field strengths and protons resonating near the water peak. This is the case for -OH-CEST effects like gagCEST or glucoCEST, but also amine exchange of creatine or glutamate which require high B1. Although, only showed for amine exchange, we propose our normalization to work generally for DIACEST, PARACEST in slow- and fast exchange regime not just as a correction, but also for quantitative CEST-MRI. Applied to acute stroke induced in rat brain, the corrected CEST signal shows significantly higher contrast between stroke area and normal tissue as well as less B1 dependency compared to conventional approaches.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.