Paper detail

Inverse scattering problem with a bare state

In hadron physics, molecular-like multihadron states can interact with compact multiquark states. The latter are modeled as bare states in the Hilbert space of a potential model. In this work, we study several potential models relevant to the bare state, and solve their inverse scattering problems. The first model, called "cc", is a separable potential model. We show that it can approximate (single-channel short-range) $S$-wave near-threshold physics with an error of $\mathcal{O}(β^3/M_V^3)$, where $β$ sets the maximum momentum of the near-threshold region and $M_V$ is the typical scale of the potential. The second model, called "bc", serves as the bare-state-dominance approximation, where interaction between continuum states is ignored. Under this model, even though the bare state is always crucial for a bound state's generation, a shallow bound state naturally tends to have a small bare-state proportion. Therefore, we need other quantities to quantify the importance of the bare state. The last model, called "bcc", is a combination of the first two models. This model not only serves as a correction to the bare-state-dominance approximation, but can also be used to understand the interplay between quark and hadron degrees of freedom. This model naturally leads to the presence of a Castillejo-Dalitz-Dyson (CDD) zero. We consider the energy decomposition of a bound state. The potential ratio of the bare-continuum interaction to the continuum self-interaction is proposed to understand how the bound state is generated. Model independently, an inequality for the potential ratio is derived. Based on the model "bcc", the CDD zero can be used to estimate the potential ratio. Finally, we apply these studies to the deuteron, $ρ$ meson, and $D_{s0}^*(2317)$, and analyze their properties.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.