Paper detail

Intrinsic convergence properties of entropic sampling algorithms

We study the convergence of the density of states and thermodynamic properties in three flat-histogram simulation methods, the Wang-Landau (WL) algorithm, the 1/t algorithm, and tomographic sampling (TS). In the first case the refinement parameter f is rescaled (f -> f/2) each time the flat-histogram condition is satisfied, in the second f ~ 1/t after a suitable initial phase, while in the third f is constant (t corresponds to Monte Carlo time). To examine the intrinsic convergence properties of these methods, free of any complications associated with a specific model, we study a featureless entropy landscape, such that for each allowed energy E = 1,...,L, there is exactly one state, that is, g(E) = 1 for all E. Convergence of sampling corresponds to g(E,t) -> const. as t -> infinity, so that the standard deviation sigma_g of g over energy values is a measure of the overall sampling error. Neither the WL algorithm nor TS converge: in both cases sigma_g saturates at long times. In the 1/t algorithm, by contrast, sigma_g decays \propto 1/\sqrt{t}. Modified TS and 1/t procedures, in which f \propto 1/t^alpha, converge for alpha values between 0 and 1. There are two essential facets to convergence of flat-histogram methods: elimination of initial errors in g(E), and correction of the sampling noise accumulated during the process. For a simple example, we demonstrate analytically, using a Langevin equation, that both kinds of errors can be eliminated, asymptotically, if f ~ 1/t^alpha with 0 < α\leq 1. Convergence is optimal for alpha = 1. For alpha \leq 0 the sampling noise never decays, while for alpha > 1 the initial error is never completely eliminated.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.