Paper detail

Intrinsic Characterization of $3$-dimensional Riemannian submanifolds of $\mathbb{R}^4$

It is well known that an $m$-dimensional Riemannian manifold can be locally isometrically embedded into the $m+1$-dimensional Euclidean space if and only if there exists a symmetric 2-tensor field satisfying the Gauss and Codazzi equations. In this paper, we prove that two known intrinsic conditions, which were obtained previously by Weiss, Thomas and Rivertz, are sufficient to ensure the existence of such symmetric 2-tensor field under certain generic condition when $m=3$. Note that, in the case $m=3$, a symmetric 2-tensor field satisfying the Gauss equation does not satisfy the Codazzi equation automatically, which is different from the cases $m \geq 4$. In our proof, the symbolic method, which is a famous tool known in classical invariant theory, plays an important role. As applications of our result, we consider $3$-dimensional warped product Riemannian manifolds whether they can be locally isometrically embedded into $\mathbb{R}^4$. In some case, the Monge-Ampère equation naturally appears.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.