Paper detail

Interpreting Deep Glucose Predictive Models for Diabetic People Using RETAIN

Progress in the biomedical field through the use of deep learning is hindered by the lack of interpretability of the models. In this paper, we study the RETAIN architecture for the forecasting of future glucose values for diabetic people. Thanks to its two-level attention mechanism, the RETAIN model is interpretable while remaining as efficient as standard neural networks. We evaluate the model on a real-world type-2 diabetic population and we compare it to a random forest model and a LSTM-based recurrent neural network. Our results show that the RETAIN model outperforms the former and equals the latter on common accuracy metrics and clinical acceptability metrics, thereby proving its legitimacy in the context of glucose level forecasting. Furthermore, we propose tools to take advantage of the RETAIN interpretable nature. As informative for the patients as for the practitioners, it can enhance the understanding of the predictions made by the model and improve the design of future glucose predictive models.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.