Paper detail

Interpolating Thin-Shell and Sharp Large-Deviation Estimates For Isotropic Log-Concave Measures

Given an isotropic random vector $X$ with log-concave density in Euclidean space $\Real^n$, we study the concentration properties of $|X|$ on all scales, both above and below its expectation. We show in particular that: \[ ¶(\abs{|X| -\sqrt{n}} \geq t \sqrt{n}) \leq C \exp(-c n^{1/2} \min(t^3,t)) \;\;\; \forall t \geq 0 ~, \] for some universal constants $c,C>0$. This improves the best known deviation results on the thin-shell and mesoscopic scales due to Fleury and Klartag, respectively, and recovers the sharp large-deviation estimate of Paouris. Another new feature of our estimate is that it improves when $X$ is $ψ_α$ ($α\in (1,2]$), in precise agreement with Paouris' estimates. The upper bound on the thin-shell width $\sqrt{\Var(|X|)}$ we obtain is of the order of $n^{1/3}$, and improves down to $n^{1/4}$ when $X$ is $ψ_2$. Our estimates thus continuously interpolate between a new best known thin-shell estimate and the sharp large-deviation estimate of Paouris. As a consequence, a new best known bound on the Cheeger isoperimetric constant appearing in a conjecture of Kannan--Lovász--Simonovits is deduced.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.