Paper detail

Interplay of dipoles and spins in $κ$-(BEDT-TTF)$_2X$, where $X=$ Hg(SCN)$_2$Cl, Hg(SCN)$_2$Br, Cu[N(CN)$_2$]Cl, Cu[N(CN)$_2$]Br, and Ag$_2$(CN)$_3$

We combine first principles density functional calculations with empirical relationships for the Coulomb interactions in the `monomer' model of $κ$-(BEDT-TTF)$_2X$. This enables us to calculate the parameters for the model of coupled dipolar and spin degrees of freedom proposed by Hotta [Phys. Rev. B $\textbf{82}$, 241104 (2010)], and Naka and Ishihara [J. Phys. Soc. Japan $\textbf{79}$, 063707 (2010)]. In all materials studied, retaining only the largest interactions leads to a transverse field Ising model of the dipoles. This quantifies, justifies and confirms recent claims that the dipoles are of crucial importance for understanding these materials. We show that two effects are responsible for a range of behaviors found in the dipoles in different $κ$-(BEDT-TTF)$_2X$ salts. (i) The inter-dimer hopping, $t_{b1}$, which gives rise to the "transverse field" in the Ising model for the dipoles ($H^T=2t_{b1}$), is between a third and a tenth smaller in the mercuric materials than for the mercury-free salts. (ii) The Ising model of dipoles is in the quasi-one-dimensional limit for the mercuric salts, but quasi-two-dimensional (between the square and isotropic triangular limits) for the mercury-free materials. Thus, the dimensionless critical field is much smaller in the mercuric compounds. Effect (ii) is much larger than effect (i). Simple explanations of both effects based on the band structures of the different salts are given. We show that dipolar order and even short-range dipolar correlations have a profound impact on the nature of the interdimer magnetic (superexchange) interactions. For example, dipole crystallization drives the materials towards quasi-one-dimensional magnetic interactions, which could be important for understanding the spin liquids found in some of these materials.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.