Paper detail

Interplay between uni-directional and bi-directional charge-density-wave orders in underdoped cuprates

We analyze the interplay between charge-density-wave (CDW) orders with axial momenta $(Q, 0)$ and $(0,Q)$ ($Δ_x$ and $Δ_y$ respectively), detected in the underdoped cuprates. The CDW order in real space can be uni-directional (either $Δ_x$ or $Δ_y$ is non-zero) or bi-directional (both $Δ_x$ and $Δ_y$ are non-zero). To understand which of the two orders develop, we adopt the magnetic scenario, in which the CDW order appears due to spin-fluctuation exchange, and derive the Ginzburg-Landau action to the sixth order in $Δ_x$ and $Δ_y$. We argue that, at the mean-field level, the CDW order is bi-directional at the onset, with equal amplitudes of $Δ_x$ and $Δ_y$, but changes to uni-directional inside the CDW phase. This implies that, at a given temperature, CDW order is uni-directional at smaller dopings, but becomes bi-directional at larger dopings. This is consistent with recent x-ray data on YBCO, which detected tendency towards bi-directional order at larger dopings. We discuss the role of discrete symmetry breaking at a higher temperature for the interplay between bi-directional and uni-directional CDW orders and also discuss the role of pair-density-wave (PDW) order, which may appear along with CDW. We argue that PDW with the same momentum as CDW changes the structure of the bi-directional charge order by completely replacing either $Δ_x$ or $Δ_y$ CDW components by PDW. However, if an "Amperean" PDW order, which pairs fermions with approximately the same momenta, is also present, both $Δ_x$ and $Δ_y$ remain non-zero in the bi-directional phase, albeit with non-equal amplitudes. This is again consistent with x-ray experiments, which at larger doping found non-equal $Δ_x$ and $Δ_y$ in every domain.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.