Paper detail

Interfacial Load Monitoring and Failure Detection in Total Joint Replacements via Piezoresistive Bone Cement and Electrical Impedance Tomography

Aseptic loosening, or loss of implant fixation, is a common complication following total joint replacement. Revision surgeries cost the healthcare system over $8 billion annually in the US. Despite the prevalence of aseptic loosening, timely and accurate detection remains a challenge because traditional imaging modalities such as plain radiographs struggle to reliably detect the early stages of implant loosening. Motivated by this challenge, we present a novel approach for in vivo monitoring and failure detection of cemented joint replacements. Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement is modified with low volume fractions of chopped carbon fiber (CF) to impart piezoresistive-based self-sensing. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is then used to detect and monitor load-induced deformation and fracture of CF/PMMA in a phantom tank. We therefore show that EIT indeed is able to adeptly detect loading force on a prosthetic surrogate, distinguish between increasing load magnitudes, detect failure of implant fixation, and even distinguish between cement cracking and cement de-bonding. Because EIT is a low-cost, physiologically benign, and potentially real-time imaging modality, the feasibility study herein presented has potential to transform the standard of care for post-operative monitoring of implant conditions. Beyond clinical relevance, this technique could positively impact orthopedic researchers by providing, via in vivo monitoring, insight into the factors that initiate aseptic loosening.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.