Paper detail

Interaction of a priori Anatomic Knowledge with Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning in Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Training deep learning models on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can be a challenge due to the small amount of expert generated labels and inherent complexity of data source. Self-supervised contrastive learning (SSCL) has recently been shown to boost performance in several medical imaging tasks. However, it is unclear how much the pre-trained representation reflects the primary organ of interest compared to spurious surrounding tissue. In this work, we evaluate the optimal method of incorporating prior knowledge of anatomy into a SSCL training paradigm. Specifically, we evaluate using a segmentation network to explicitly local the heart in CMR images, followed by SSCL pretraining in multiple diagnostic tasks. We find that using a priori knowledge of anatomy can greatly improve the downstream diagnostic performance. Furthermore, SSCL pre-training with in-domain data generally improved downstream performance and more human-like saliency compared to end-to-end training and ImageNet pre-trained networks. However, introducing anatomic knowledge to pre-training generally does not have significant impact.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.