Paper detail

Interacting Majorana modes at surfaces of noncentrosymmetric superconductors

Noncentrosymmetric superconductors with line nodes are expected to possess topologically protected flat zero-energy bands of surface states, which can be described as Majorana modes. We here investigate their fate if residual interactions beyond BCS theory are included. For a minimal square-lattice model with a plaquette interaction, we find string-like integrals of motion that form Clifford algebras and lead to exact degeneracies. These degeneracies strongly depend on whether the numbers of sites in the $x$ and $y$ directions are even or odd, and are robust against disorder in the interactions. We show that the mapping of the Majorana model onto two decoupled spin compass models [Kamiya et al., Phys. Rev. B 98, 161409 (2018)] and extra spectator degrees of freedom only works for open boundary conditions. The mapping shows that the three-leg and four-leg Majorana ladders are integrable, while systems of larger width are not. In addition, the mapping maximally reduces the effort for exact diagonalization, which is utilized to obtain the gap above the ground states. We find that this gap remains open if one dimension is kept constant and even, while the other is sent to infinity, at least if that dimension is odd. Moreover, we compare the topological properties of the interacting Majorana model to those of the toric-code model. The Majorana model has long-range entangled ground states that differ by $\mathbb{Z}_2$ fluxes through the system on a torus. The ground states exhibit string condensation similar to the toric code but the topological order is not robust. While the spectrum is gapped - due to spontaneous symmetry breaking inherited from the compass models - states with different values of the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ fluxes end up in the ground-state sector in the thermodynamic limit. Hence, the gap does not protect these fluxes against weak perturbations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.