Paper detail

Interacting Dark Sectors in Anisotropic Universe: Observational Constraints and $H_{0}$ Tension

The present study reveals observational constraints on the coupling between dark components of anisotropic Bianchi type I universe. We assume interaction between dark matter and dark energy and split the continuity equation with inclusion of interaction term $Γ$. Two scenarios have been considered (i) when coupling between dark components is constant and (ii) when it is a function of redshift ($z$). Metropolis-Hasting algorithm has been used to perform Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) analysis by using observational Hubble data obtained from cosmic chronometric (CC) technique, cosmic microwave background (CMB) baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO), Pantheon compilation of Supernovae type Ia (SNIa), their joint combination and a Gaussian prior on the Hubble parameter $H_{0}$. It is obtained that the combination of all databases plus $H_{0}$ prior marginalized over a present dark energy density gives stringent constraints on the current value of coupling as $-0.001<δ<0.041$ in constant coupling model and $-0.042<δ<0.053$ in varying coupling model at 68\% confident level. In general, for both models, we found $ω^{X}\approx -1$ and $δ(δ_{0})\approx 0$ which indicate that still recent data favor uncoupled $Λ$CDM model. Our estimations show that in constant coupling model $(H_{0}=73.9^{+1.5}_{-0.95}, δ=0.023^{+0.017}_{-0.024})$ which naturally leads to consistent value of the Hubble constant. This result is interesting because the previous works show that such a high value of Hubble constant requires the significant value of coupling parameter $δ$. It has been also observed that in the constant coupling model, we do not find any disagreement between the estimated $H_{0}$ and those reported by Hubble space telescope (HST) and large scale structure (LSS) experiments.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.