Paper detail

Integrative Analysis of Prognosis Data on Multiple Cancer Subtypes using Penalization

In cancer research, profiling studies have been extensively conducted, searching for genes/SNPs associated with prognosis. Cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Examining similarity and difference in the genetic basis of multiple subtypes of the same cancer can lead to better understanding of their connections and distinctions. Classic meta-analysis approaches analyze each subtype separately and then compare analysis results across subtypes. Integrative analysis approaches, in contrast, analyze the raw data on multiple subtypes simultaneously and can outperform meta-analysis. In this study, prognosis data on multiple subtypes of the same cancer are analyzed. An AFT (accelerated failure time) model is adopted to describe survival. The genetic basis of multiple subtypes is described using the heterogeneity model, which allows a gene/SNP to be associated with the prognosis of some subtypes but not the others. A compound penalization approach is developed to conduct gene-level analysis and identify genes that contain important SNPs associated with prognosis. The proposed approach has an intuitive formulation and can be realized using an iterative algorithm. Asymptotic properties are rigorously established. Simulation shows that the proposed approach has satisfactory performance and outperforms meta-analysis using penalization. An NHL (non-Hodgkin lymphoma) prognosis study with SNP measurements is analyzed. Genes associated with the three major subtypes, namely DLBCL, FL, and CLL/SLL, are identified. The proposed approach identifies genes different from alternative analysis and has reasonable prediction performance.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.