Paper detail

Integrating K-means with Quadratic Programming Feature Selection

Several data mining problems are characterized by data in high dimensions. One of the popular ways to reduce the dimensionality of the data is to perform feature selection, i.e, select a subset of relevant and non-redundant features. Recently, Quadratic Programming Feature Selection (QPFS) has been proposed which formulates the feature selection problem as a quadratic program. It has been shown to outperform many of the existing feature selection methods for a variety of applications. Though, better than many existing approaches, the running time complexity of QPFS is cubic in the number of features, which can be quite computationally expensive even for moderately sized datasets. In this paper we propose a novel method for feature selection by integrating k-means clustering with QPFS. The basic variant of our approach runs k-means to bring down the number of features which need to be passed on to QPFS. We then enhance this idea, wherein we gradually refine the feature space from a very coarse clustering to a fine-grained one, by interleaving steps of QPFS with k-means clustering. Every step of QPFS helps in identifying the clusters of irrelevant features (which can then be thrown away), whereas every step of k-means further refines the clusters which are potentially relevant. We show that our iterative refinement of clusters is guaranteed to converge. We provide bounds on the number of distance computations involved in the k-means algorithm. Further, each QPFS run is now cubic in number of clusters, which can be much smaller than actual number of features. Experiments on eight publicly available datasets show that our approach gives significant computational gains (both in time and memory), over standard QPFS as well as other state of the art feature selection methods, even while improving the overall accuracy.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.