Paper detail

Integrable embeddings and foliations

A k-submanifold L of an open n-manifold M is called weakly integrable (WI) [resp. strongly integrable (SI)] if there exists a submersion Φ:M\to R^{n-k} such that L\subset Φ^{-1}(0) [resp. L= Φ^{-1}(0)]. In this work we study the following problem, first stated in a particular case by Costa et al. (Invent. Math. 1988): which submanifolds L of an open manifold M are WI or SI? For general M, we explicitly solve the case k=n-1 and provide necessary and sufficient conditions for submanifolds to be WI and SI in higher codimension. As particular cases we recover the theorem of Bouma and Hector (Indagationes Math. 1983) asserting that any open orientable surface is SI in R^3, and Watanabe's and Miyoshi's theorems (Topology 1993 and 1995) claiming that any link is WI in an open 3-manifold. In the case M=R^n we fully characterize WI and SI submanifolds, we provide examples of 3- and 7-manifolds which are not WI and we show that a theorem by Miyoshi (Topology 1995) which states that any link in R^3 is SI does not hold in general. The right analogue to Miyoshi's theorem is also proved, implying in particular the surprising result that no knot in R^3 is SI. Our results applied to the theory of foliations of Euclidean spaces give rise to some striking corollaries: using some topological invariants we classify all the submanifolds of R^n which can be realized as proper leaves of foliations; we prove that S^3 can be realized as a leaf of a foliation of R^n, n\geq 7, but not in R^5 or R^6, which partially answers a question by Vogt (Math. Ann. 1993); we construct open 3-manifolds which cannot be leaves of a foliation of any compact 4-manifold but are proper leaves in R^4. The theory of WI and SI submanifolds is a framework where many classical tools of differential and algebraic topology play a prominent role: h-principle, complete intersections and the theory of immersions and embeddings.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.