Paper detail

Integrability of Moufang Foundations - A Contribution to the Classification of Twin Buildings

Buildings have been introduced by J. Tits in order to study semi-simple algebraic groups from a geometrical point of view. One of the most important results in the theory of buildings is the classification of irreducible spherical buildings of rank at least 3. About 25 years ago, M. Ronan and J. Tits defined the class of twin buildings, which generalize spherical buildings in a natural way. The motivation of their definition is provided by the theory of Kac-Moody groups. A 2-spherical twin building is uniquely determined by its local structure in almost all cases: The so-called foundation is the union of the rank 2 residues which contain an (arbitrary) chamber. Therefore, the classification of 2-spherical twin buildings reduces to the classification of all foundations which can be realized as the local structure of such a twin building. We call such a foundation "integrable". By a result of Tits, an integrable foundation is Moufang, which means that the rank 2 buildings in the foundation are Moufang polygons, and that the glueings are compatible with the Moufang structures induced on the rank 1 residues. As a consequence, the classification of Moufang polygons and the solution of the isomorphism problem for Moufang sets are essential to work out which Moufang polygons fit together in order to form a foundation. The present thesis contributes to establish complete lists of integrable foundations for certain types of diagrams, namely for simply laced diagrams and for 443 triangle diagrams. In this process, we closely follow the approach for the classification of spherical buildings. However, we have to refine the techniques used there, since in general, foundations don't only depend on the diagram and the defining field. Moreover, one of the main results in the context of Moufang sets is the solution of the isomorphism problem for Moufang sets of pseudo-quadratic spaces.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.