Paper detail

Instantaneous Gelation in Smoluchowski's Coagulation Equation Revisited

We study the solutions of the Smoluchowski coagulation equation with a regularisation term which removes clusters from the system when their mass exceeds a specified cut-off size, M. We focus primarily on collision kernels which would exhibit an instantaneous gelation transition in the absence of any regularisation. Numerical simulations demonstrate that for such kernels with monodisperse initial data, the regularised gelation time decreases as M increases, consistent with the expectation that the gelation time is zero in the unregularised system. This decrease appears to be a logarithmically slow function of M, indicating that instantaneously gelling kernels may still be justifiable as physical models despite the fact that they are highly singular in the absence of a cut-off. We also study the case when a source of monomers is introduced in the regularised system. In this case a stationary state is reached. We present a complete analytic description of this regularised stationary state for the model kernel, K(m_1,m_2)=max{m_1,m_2}^v, which gels instantaneously when M tends to infinity if v>1. The stationary cluster size distribution decays as a stretched exponential for small cluster sizes and crosses over to a power law decay with exponent v for large cluster sizes. The total particle density in the stationary state slowly vanishes as (Log M^(v-1))^-1/2 when M gets large. The approach to the stationary state is non-trivial : oscillations about the stationary state emerge from the interplay between the monomer injection and the cut-off, M, which decay very slowly when M is large. A quantitative analysis of these oscillations is provided for the addition model which describes the situation in which clusters can only grow by absorbing monomers.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.