Paper detail

Instability of the chiral d-wave RVB state for the Heisenberg model on triangular lattice and an improvement of the Gutzwiller approximation

Through Variational Monte Carlo simulation we show the d-wave RVB pairing in the Heisenberg model on triangular lattice can be better described in terms of a two component order parameter. The fully gapped chiral d-wave RVB state, which is predicted by the mean field theory to be the unique minimum of variational energy in the two dimensional representation space of d-wave pairing, is found to be actually a local maximum and the true minimum of energy is reached by the non-chiral $d_{xy}$ state with line nodes. We also find that the usual Gutzwiller approximation, which enjoys great success for the square lattice system, fails badly on the triangular lattice as a result of the geometric frustration inherent of the system. An improved version of the Gutzwiiler approximation is proposed and is found to give a much better results than the usual one.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.