Paper detail

Instability Mechanism for STT-MRAM switching

To optimize the design of STT-MRAM (spin-transfer torque magnetic random access memory), it is necessary to be able to predict switching (error) rates. For small elements, this can be done using a single-macrospin theory since the element will switch quasi-uniformly. Experimental results on switching rates suggest that elements large enough to be thermally stable switch by some mechanism with a lower energy barrier. It has been suggested that this mechanism is local nucleation, but we have also previously reported a global magnetostatic instability, which is consistent with the lower experimental energy barriers. In this paper, we try to determine which of these mechanisms is most important by visualizing the switching in a "U-NU" (uniform - nonuniform) phase diagram. We find that switching trajectories follow the horizontal U axis (i.e., quasi-uniform precession) until they reach a critical amplitude, at which the magnetostatic instability grows exponentially and a domain wall forms at the center, whose motion completes the switching. We have tried unsuccessfully to induce local nucleation (a domain wall at the edge). We conclude that the dominant switching mechanism is not edge nucleation, but the magnetostatic instability.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.