Paper detail

Instabilities and chaos in the classical three-body and three-rotor problems

This thesis studies instabilities and singularities in a geometrical approach to the planar 3-body problem as well as instabilities, chaos and ergodicity in the 3-rotor problem. Trajectories of the planar 3-body problem are expressed as geodesics of the Jacobi-Maupertuis (JM) metric on the configuration space $C^3$. Translation, rotation and scaling isometries lead to reduced dynamics on quotients of $C^3$ that encode information on the full dynamics. Riemannian submersions are used to find the quotient metrics and to show that the geodesic formulation regularizes collisions for the $1/r^2$ but not for the $1/r$ potential. Extending work of Montgomery, we show the negativity of the scalar curvature on the center of mass configuration space and certain quotients for equal masses and zero energy. Sectional curvatures are also found to be largely negative indicating widespread geodesic instabilities. In the 3-rotor problem, 3 equal masses move on a circle subject to attractive cosine inter-particle potentials. This problem arises as the classical limit of a model of coupled Josephson junctions. The energy E serves as a control parameter. We find analogues of the Euler-Lagrange family of periodic solutions: pendula and breathers at all E and choreographies up to moderate E. The model displays order-chaos-order behavior and undergoes a fairly sharp transition to chaos at a critical energy E$_c$ with several manifestations: (a) a dramatic rise in the fraction of Poincaré surfaces occupied by chaotic sections, (b) spontaneous breaking of discrete symmetries, (c) a geometric cascade of stability transitions in pendula and (d) a change in the sign of the JM curvature. Poincaré sections indicate global chaos in a band of energies slightly above E$_c$ where we provide evidence for ergodicity and mixing with respect to the Liouville measure and study the statistics of recurrence times.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.