Paper detail

Injectivity of Gabor phase retrieval from lattice measurements

We establish novel uniqueness results for the Gabor phase retrieval problem: if $\mathcal{G} : L^2(\mathbb{R}) \to L^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$ denotes the Gabor transform then every $f \in L^4[-\tfrac{c}{2},\tfrac{c}{2}]$ is determined up to a global phase by the values $|\mathcal{G}f(x,ω)|$ where $(x,ω)$ are points on the lattice $b^{-1}\mathbb{Z} \times (2c)^{-1}\mathbb{Z}$ and $b>0$ is an arbitrary positive constant. This for the first time shows that compactly-supported, complex-valued functions can be uniquely reconstructed from lattice samples of their spectrogram. Moreover, by making use of recent developments related to sampling in shift-invariant spaces by Gröchenig, Romero and Stöckler, we prove analogous uniqueness results for functions in shift-invariant spaces with Gaussian generator. Generalizations to nonuniform sampling are also presented. Finally, we compare our results to the situation where the considered signals are assumed to be real-valued.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.