Paper detail

Inhomogeneities in the $2$-Flavor Chiral Gross-Neveu Model

We investigate the finite-temperature and -density chiral Gross-Neveu model with an axial U$_A$(1) symmetry in $1+1$ dimensions on the lattice. In the limit where the number of flavors $N_\mathrm{f}$ tends to infinity the continuum model has been solved analytically and shows two phases: a symmetric high-temperature phase with a vanishing condensate and a low-temperature phase in which the complex condensate forms a chiral spiral which breaks translation invariance. In the lattice simulations we employ chiral SLAC fermions with exact axial symmetry. Similarly to $N_\mathrm{f}\to\infty$, we find for $8$ flavors, where quantum and thermal fluctuations are suppressed, two distinct regimes in the $(T,μ)$ phase diagram, characterized by qualitatively different behavior of the two-point functions of the condensate fields. More surprisingly, at $N_\mathrm{f}=2$, where fluctuations are no longer suppressed, the model still behaves similarly to the $N_\mathrm{f}\to\infty$ model and we conclude that the chiral spiral leaves its footprints even on systems with a small number of flavors. For example, at low temperature the two-point functions are still dominated by chiral spirals with pitches proportional to the inverse chemical potential, although in contrast to large-$N_\mathrm{f}$ their amplitudes decrease with distance. We argue that these results should not be interpreted as the spontaneous breaking of a continuous symmetry, which is forbidden in two dimensions. Finally, using Dyson-Schwinger equations we calculate the decay of the U$_A$(1)-invariant fermion four-point function in search for a BKT phase at zero temperature.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.