Paper detail

Information topology identifies emergent model classes

We develop a language for describing the relationship among observations, mathematical models, and the underlying principles from which they are derived. Using Information Geometry, we consider geometric properties of statistical models for different observations. As observations are varied, the model manifold may be stretched, compressed, or even collapsed. Observations that preserve the structural identifiability of the parameters also preserve certain topological features (such as edges and corners) that characterize the model's underlying physical principles. We introduce Information Topology in analogy with information geometry as characterizing the "abstract model" of which statistical models are realizations. Observations that change the topology, i.e., "manifold collapse," require a modification of the abstract model in order to construct identifiable statistical models. Often, the essential topological feature is a hierarchical structure of boundaries (faces, edges, corners, etc.) which we represent as a hierarchical graph known as a Hasse diagram. Low-dimensional elements of this diagram are simple models that describe the dominant behavioral modes, what we call emergent model classes. Observations that preserve the Hasse diagram are diffeomorphically related and form a group, the collection of which form a partially ordered set. All possible observations have a semi-group structure. For hierarchical models, we consider how the topology of simple models is embedded in that of larger models. When emergent model classes are unstable to the introduction of new parameters, we classify the new parameters as relevant. Conversely, the emergent model classes are stable to the introduction of irrelevant parameters. In this way, information topology provides a general language for exploring representations of physical systems and their relationships to observations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.