Paper detail

Information-theoretic thresholds for community detection in sparse networks

We give upper and lower bounds on the information-theoretic threshold for community detection in the stochastic block model. Specifically, consider the symmetric stochastic block model with $q$ groups, average degree $d$, and connection probabilities $c_\text{in}/n$ and $c_\text{out}/n$ for within-group and between-group edges respectively; let $λ= (c_\text{in}-c_\text{out})/(qd)$. We show that, when $q$ is large, and $λ= O(1/q)$, the critical value of $d$ at which community detection becomes possible---in physical terms, the condensation threshold---is \[ d_\text{c} = Θ\!\left( \frac{\log q}{q λ^2} \right) \, , \] with tighter results in certain regimes. Above this threshold, we show that any partition of the nodes into $q$ groups which is as `good' as the planted one, in terms of the number of within- and between-group edges, is correlated with it. This gives an exponential-time algorithm that performs better than chance; specifically, community detection becomes possible below the Kesten-Stigum bound for $q \ge 5$ in the disassortative case $λ< 0$, and for $q \ge 11$ in the assortative case $λ>0$ (similar upper bounds were obtained independently by Abbe and Sandon). Conversely, below this threshold, we show that no algorithm can label the vertices better than chance, or even distinguish the block model from an \ER\ random graph with high probability. Our lower bound on $d_\text{c}$ uses Robinson and Wormald's small subgraph conditioning method, and we also give (less explicit) results for non-symmetric stochastic block models. In the symmetric case, we obtain explicit results by using bounds on certain functions of doubly stochastic matrices due to Achlioptas and Naor; indeed, our lower bound on $d_\text{c}$ is their second moment lower bound on the $q$-colorability threshold for random graphs with a certain effective degree.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors6 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.