Paper detail

Information-Theoretic Lower Bounds on the Storage Cost of Shared Memory Emulation

The focus of this paper is to understand storage costs of emulating an atomic shared memory over an asynchronous, distributed message passing system. Previous literature has developed several shared memory emulation algorithms based on replication and erasure coding techniques. In this paper, we present information-theoretic lower bounds on the storage costs incurred by shared memory emulation algorithms. Our storage cost lower bounds are universally applicable, that is, we make no assumption on the structure of the algorithm or the method of encoding the data. We consider an arbitrary algorithm $A$ that implements an atomic multi-writer single-reader (MWSR) shared memory variable whose values come from a finite set $\mathcal{V}$ over a system of $N$ servers connected by point-to-point asynchronous links. We require that in every fair execution of algorithm $A$ where the number of server failures is smaller than a parameter $f$, every operation invoked at a non-failing client terminates. We define the storage cost of a server in algorithm $A$ as the logarithm (to base 2) of number of states it can take on; the total-storage cost of algorithm $A$ is the sum of the storage cost of all servers. Our results are as follows. (i) We show that if algorithm $A$ does not use server gossip, then the total storage cost is lower bounded by $2 \frac{N}{N-f+1}\log_2|\mathcal{V}|-o(\log_2|\mathcal{V}|)$. (ii) The total storage cost is at least $2 \frac{N}{N-f+2} \log_{2}|\mathcal{V}|-o(\log_{2}|\mathcal{V}|)$ even if the algorithm uses server gossip. (iii) We consider algorithms where the write protocol sends information about the value in at most one phase. We show that the total storage cost is at least $ν^* \frac{N}{N-f+ν^*-1} \log_2( |\mathcal{V}|)- o(\log_2(|\mathcal{V}|),$ where $ν^*$ is the minimum of $f+1$ and the number of active write operations of an execution.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.