Paper detail

Information density, structure and entropy in equilibrium and non-equilibrium systems

During a spontaneous change, a macroscopic physical system will evolve towards a macro-state with more realizations. This observation is at the basis of the Statistical Mechanical version of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and it provides an interpretation of entropy in terms of probabilities. However, we cannot rely on the statistical-mechanical expressions for entropy in systems that are far from equilibrium. In this paper, we compare various extensions of the definition of entropy, which have been proposed for non-equilibrium systems. It has recently been proposed that measures of information density may serve to quantify entropy in both equilibrium and nonequilibrium systems. We propose a new "bit-wise" method to measure the information density for off lattice systems. This method does not rely on coarse-graining of the particle coordinates. We then compare different estimates of the system entropy, based on information density and on the structural properties of the system, and check if the various entropies are mutually consistent and, importantly, whether they can detect non-trivial ordering phenomena. We find that, except for simple (one-dimensional) cases, the different methods yield answers that are at best qualitatively similar, and often not even that, although in several cases, different entropy estimates do detect ordering phenomena qualitatively. Our entropy estimates based on bit-wise data compression contain no adjustable scaling factor, and show large quantitative differences with the thermodynamic entropy obtained from equilibrium simulations. Hence, our results suggest that, at present, there is not yet a single, structure-based entropy definition that has general validity for equilibrium and non equilibrium systems.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.