Paper detail

Information Content of Hierarchical n-Point Polytope Functions for Quantifying and Reconstructing Disordered Systems

Disordered systems are ubiquitous in physical, biological and material sciences. Examples include liquid and glassy states of condensed matter, colloids, granular materials, porous media, composites, alloys, packings of cells in avian retina and tumor spheroids, to name but a few. A comprehensive understanding of such disordered systems requires, as the first step, systematic quantification, modeling and representation of the underlying complex configurations and microstructure, which is generally very challenging to achieve. Recently, we introduce a set of hierarchical statistical microstructural descriptors, i.e., the n-point polytope functions Pn, which are derived from the standard n-point correlation functions Sn, and successively include higher-order n-point statistics of the morphological features of interest in a concise, explainable, and expressive manner. Here we investigate the information content of the Pn functions via optimization-based realization rendering. This is achieved by successively incorporating higher order Pn functions up to n = 8 and quantitatively assessing the accuracy of the reconstructed systems via un-constrained statistical morphological descriptors (e.g., the lineal-path function). We examine a wide spectrum of representative random systems with distinct geometrical and topological features. We find that generally, successively incorporating higher order Pn functions, and thus, the higher-order morphological information encoded in these descriptors, leads to superior accuracy of the reconstructions. However, incorporating more Pn functions into the reconstruction also significantly increases the complexity and roughness of the associated energy landscape for the underlying stochastic optimization, making it difficult to convergence numerically.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.