Paper detail

Influence of the proton initiated at most two electromagnetic sub-cascades events on IACT observations

The efficiency of the $γ$/hadron separation worsens significantly at low energies for Imaging Air Cherenkov Telescopes (IACT). This observed effect was partially explained by the occurrence of a hardly reducible hadronic background (i.e. detected images that are formed mainly by the light from a single electromagnetic or a single $π^0$ sub-cascade in the proton induced shower) [1,2]. IACTs also record events containing Cherenkov light from at most two electromagnetic sub-cascades, which don't have to be products of single $π^0$ decay in the hadron initiated showers. In this paper, the impact of at most two electromagnetic sub-cascades events on the primary $γ$-ray selection was studied using the Monte Carlo simulations. We investigate how the total fraction of at most two sub-cascades events in the expected total protonic background depends on the hadron interaction models (GHEISHA and FLUKA), trigger threshold, reflector area and altitude of the observatory. We show that the efficiency of the $γ$/hadron separation is anti-correlated with the contribution of at most two electromagnetic sub-cascades events in the proton initiated showers below 200 GeV. The influence of at most two electromagnetic sub-cascades events on the $γ$-ray selection is similar to the effect of the single electromagnetic sub-cascade and singe $π^0$ events in IACT observations. The occurrence of all these images in the data collected by IACTs reduces the efficiency of the $γ$/hadron separation at low energies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.