Paper detail

Influence of Strand Design, Boron Type, and Carbon Doping Method on the Transport Properties of Powder-in-Tube MgB2-XCX Strands

The transport properties of a number of MgB2 strands have been investigated in terms of their response to strand design, starting B powder choice, and the approach to C doping used. The strands had various designs, specifically; (i) several chemical barriers were introduced, viz: Fe and Nb, (ii) the strands were encased in various outer-sheath materials, viz.: monel, Cu+monel, monel+glidcop, Nb+monel, (iii) the filament counts were varied (1, 18, and 36), and (iv) the final strand diameter was varied. In addition, for a subset of the strand designs several B powder and C-dopant types were investigated. Specifically, two types of amorphous B powder were used: (i) Moissan based "Tangshan boron" (ii) "SMI-boron" which is produced in a plasma torch by the reduction-by-hydrogen of BCl3. Two approaches to C doping were taken: (i) "malic-acid treatment" in which C is introduced into the B powder precursor by the moderate temperature drying out a slurry of B mixed in with a malic-acid-toluene solution (during which the malic acid decomposes leaving C as the only solid residue) before the Mg powder is mixed in; (ii) direct C doping of the SMI-produced B by introducing a known percentage of CH4 into the plasma flame. Critical current densities, Jc, were measured on 1.5 m long samples at 4.2 K in fields of up to 14 T; of all the strands measured, that doped with SMI-C at a nominal 4 mol% C (in relation B) yielded the highest Jc values e.g 1.1x105 A/cm2 at 7 T, 4.5x104 at 10 T, and 2.2x104 A/cm2 at 12 T. The n-values are given for all strands at 5 and 10 T, and for a certain set of strands the magnetic field dependencies of the n-values and the influence of C-doping is presented. Finally we demonstrate that, over a wide range of B, log(Jc) decreases linearly with B with a slope -α such that the Jc(B) of any strand can be parameterized in terms of α and its zero-field intercept Jc(B=0).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.