Paper detail

Influence of multiphonon excitations and transfer on the fusion of Ca+Zr

Fusion data for $^{48}$Ca+$^{90,96}$Zr are analyzed by coupled-channels calculations that are based on the M3Y+repulsion, double-folding potential. By applying a previously determined nuclear density of $^{48}$Ca, the neutron densities of the zirconium isotopes are adjusted to optimize the fit to the fusion data, whereas the proton densities are determined by electron scattering experiments. It is shown that the fusion data can be explained fairly well by including couplings to one- and two-phonon excitations of the reacting nuclei and to one- and two-nucleon transfer reactions but there is also some sensitivity to multiphonon excitations. The neutron skin thicknesses extracted for the two zirconium isotopes are consistent with anti-proton measurements. The densities of the zirconium isotopes are used together with the previously determined nuclear density of $^{40}$Ca to calculate the M3Y+repulsion potentials and predict the fusion cross sections of $^{40}$Ca+$^{90,96}$Zr. The predicted cross sections for $^{40}$Ca+$^{90}$Zr are in reasonable agreement with the data when the influence of multiphonon excitations and a modest transfer is considered. The prediction of the $^{40}$Ca+$^{96}$Zr fusion cross section, on the other hand, is poor and under-predicts the data by 30 to 40%. Although couplings to transfer channels with positive $Q$ values were expected to play an important role, they are not able to explain the data, primarily because the predicted Coulomb barrier is about 1.5 MeV too high. Possible reasons for this failure are discussed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.