Paper detail

Influence of Edge Functionalization on Electronic and Optical Properties of Armchair Phosphorene Nanoribbons: a First-Principles Study

In this work, we present a systematic first-principles density-functional theory based study of geometry, electronic structure, and optical properties of armchair phosphorene nanoribbons (APNRs), with the aim of understanding the influence of edge passivation. Ribbons of width ranging from 0.33 nm to 3.8 nm were considered, with their edges functionalized with the groups H, OH, F, Cl, S, and Se. The geometries of various APNRs were optimized, and the stability was checked by calculating their formation energies. Using the relaxed geometries, calculations of their band structure and optical properties were performed. Pristine APNRs, as expected, exhibit significant edge reconstruction, rendering them indirect band gap semiconductors, except for one width {\normalsize{}($N=5$, where $N$ is the width parameter)} for which a direct band gap is observed. The edge passivated APNRs are found to be direct band gap semiconductors, with the band gap at the $Γ$-point, for all the functional groups considered in this work. To obtain accurate estimates of band gaps, calculations were also performed using HSE06 hybrid functional for several APNRs. Our calculations reveal that functional groups have significant influence on the band gaps and optical properties of narrower APNRs. For wider passivated ribbons, with the increasing ribbon widths, the gaps converge to almost the same value, irrespective of the group. We also performed calculations including the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) for hydrogen passivated APNRs with $N=5$ and 11. We found that SOC has no significant influence on the band structure of the studied APNRs. However, for the broader APNR, a lowering of peak intensities was observed in the optical absorption spectrum beyond 5 eV.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.