Paper detail

Influence of coalescence parameters on the production of protons and Helium-3 fragments

The time evolution of protons and $^3$He fragments from Au+Au/Pb+Pb reactions at 0.25, 2, and 20 GeV$/$nucleon is investigated with the potential version of the Ultrarelativistic Quantum Molecular Dynamics (UrQMD) model combined with the traditional coalescence afterburner. In the coalescence process, the relative distance $R_0$ and relative momentum $P_0$ are surveyed in the range of 3-4 fm and 0.25-0.35 GeV$/$c, respectively. For both clusters, a strong reversed correlation between $R_0$ and $P_0$ is seen and it is time-dependent as well. For protons, the accepted ($R_0$, $P_0$) bands lie in the time interval 30-60 fm$/$c, while for $^3$He, a longer time evolution (at about 60-90 fm$/$c) is needed. Otherwise, much smaller $R_0$ and $P_0$ values should be chosen. If we further look at the rapidity distributions from both central and semi-central collisions, it is found that the accepted [$t_{\rm cut}, (R_0, P_0$)] assemble can provide consistent results for proton yield and collective flows especially at mid-rapdities, while for $^3$He, the consistency is destroyed at both middle and projectile-target rapidities.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.