Paper detail

Inflation and deflation in stock markets

The aim of this paper is to compare statistical properties of a bubble period with those of the anti-bubble period in stock markets. We investigate the statistical properties of daily data for the Nikkei 225 index in the 28-year period from January 1975 to April 2003, corresponded to the periods of bubbles and anti-bubbles. We divide the time series into two parts, the period of {\it inflation (or bubbles)} from January 1975 to December 2002 and the period of {\it deflation (or anti-bubbles)} from January 1990 to December 2002. We find that the volatility in the inflationary period is approximated by the $q$-exponential distribution with $ q = 1.14 $ while the volatility distribution in the deflationary period is accurately described by an {\it exponential} distribution, that is, the $q$-exponential distribution with $ q \to 1 $. Our empirical findings suggest that the momentous structural changes have occurred at the beginning of 1990 when the speculative bubble was collapsed in the Japan's stock markets. Keywords: econophysics, inflationary period, deflationary period, power law, exponential (Bolztmann-Gibbs) law; PACS 89.90.+n; 05.40.-a;

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.