Paper detail

Infinite density matrix renormalization group for multicomponent quantum Hall systems

While the simplest quantum Hall plateaus, such as the $ν= 1/3$ state in GaAs, can be conveniently analyzed by assuming only a single active Landau level participates, for many phases the spin, valley, bilayer, subband, or higher Landau level indices play an important role. These `multi-component' problems are difficult to study using exact diagonalization because each component increases the difficulty exponentially. An important example is the plateau at $ν= 5/2$, where scattering into higher Landau levels chooses between the competing non-Abelian Pfaffian and anti-Pfaffian states. We address the methodological issues required to apply the infinite density matrix renormalization group to quantum Hall systems with multiple components and long-range Coulomb interactions, greatly extending accessible system sizes. As an initial application we study the problem of Landau level mixing in the $ν= 5/2$ state. Within the approach to Landau level mixing used here, we find that at the Coulomb point the anti-Pfaffian is preferred over the Pfaffian state over a range of Landau level mixing up to the experimentally relevant values.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.