Paper detail

Inferring Social Structure and Dominance Relationships Between Rhesus macaques using RFID Tracking Data

In this paper we address the problem of inferring social structure and dominance relationships in a group of rhesus macaques (a species of monkey) using only position data captured using RFID tags. Automatic inference of the social structure in an animal group enables a number of important capabilities, including: 1) A verifiable measure of how the social structure is affected by an intervention such as a change in the environment, or the introduction of another animal, and 2) A potentially significant reduction in person hours normally used for assessing these changes. Social structure in a group is an important indicator of its members' relative level of access to resources and has interesting implications for an individual's health and learning in groups. There are two main quantitative criteria assessed in order to infer the social structure; Time spent close to conspecifics, and displacements. An interaction matrix is used to represent the total duration of events detected as grooming behavior between any two monkeys. This forms an undirected tie-strength (closeness of relationships) graph. A directed graph of hierarchy is constructed by using the well cited assumption of a linear hierarchy for rhesus macaques. Events that contribute to the adjacency matrix for this graph are withdrawals or displacements where a lower ranked monkey moves away from a higher ranked monkey. Displacements are one of the observable behaviors that can act as a strong indication of tie-strength and dominance. To quantify the directedness of interaction during these events we construct histograms of the dot products of motion orientation and relative position. This gives us a measure of how much time a monkey spends in moving towards or away from other group members.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.