Paper detail

Inferring Parsimonious Coupling Statistics in Nonlinear Dynamics with Variational Gaussian Processes

Falsification is the basis for testing existing hypotheses, and a great danger is posed when results incorrectly reject our prior notions (false positives). Though nonparametric and nonlinear exploratory methods of uncovering coupling provide a flexible framework to study network configurations and discover causal graphs, multiple comparisons analyses make false positives more likely, exacerbating the need for their control. We aim to robustify the Gaussian Processes Convergent Cross-Mapping (GP-CCM) method through Variational Bayesian Gaussian Process modeling (VGP-CCM). We alleviate computational costs of integrating with conditional hyperparameter distributions through mean field approximations. This approximation model, in conjunction with permutation sampling of the null distribution, permits significance statistics that are more robust than permutation sampling with point hyperparameters. Simulated unidirectional Lorenz-Rossler systems as well as mechanistic models of neurovascular systems are used to evaluate the method. The results demonstrate that the proposed method yields improved specificity, showing promise to combat false positives

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.