Paper detail

Inferring neuronal couplings from spiking data using a systematic procedure with a statistical criterion

Recent remarkable advances in the experimental techniques have provided a background for inferring neuronal couplings from point process data that includes a great number of neurons. Here, we propose a systematic procedure for pre- and post-processing generic point process data in an objective manner, to handle data in the framework of a binary simple statistical model, the Ising or generalized McCulloch--Pitts model. The procedure involves two steps: (1) determining time-bin size for transforming the point-process data into discrete-time binary data and (2) screening relevant couplings from the estimated couplings. For the first step, we decide the optimal time-bin size by introducing the null hypothesis that all neurons would fire independently, then choosing a time-bin size so that the null hypothesis is rejected with the most strict criterion. The likelihood associated with the null hypothesis is analytically evaluated and used for the rejection process. For the second post-processing step, after a certain estimator of coupling is obtained based on the pre-processed dataset, the estimate is compared with many other estimates derived from datasets obtained by randomizing the original dataset in the time direction. We accept the original estimate as relevant only if its absolute value is sufficiently larger than them of randomized datasets. These manipulations suppress false positive couplings induced by statistical noise. We apply this inference procedure to spiking data from synthetic and in vitro neuronal networks. The results show that the proposed procedure identifies the presence/absence of synaptic couplings fairly well including their signs, for the synthetic and experimental data. In particular, the results support that we can infer the physical connections of underlying systems in favorable situations, even when using the simple statistical model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.