Paper detail

Inference for Monotone Trends Under Dependence

We focus on the problem estimating a monotone trend function under additive and dependent noise. New point-wise confidence interval estimators under both short- and long-range dependent errors are introduced and studied. These intervals are obtained via the method of inversion of certain discrepancy statistics arising in hypothesis testing problems. The advantage of this approach is that it avoids the estimation of nuisance parameters such as the derivative of the unknown function, which existing methods are forced to deal with. While the methodology is motivated by earlier work in the independent context, the dependence of the errors, especially longrange dependence leads to new challenges, such as the study of convex minorants of drifted fractional Brownian motion that may be of independent interest. We also unravel a new family of universal limit distributions (and tabulate selected quantiles) that can henceforth be used for inference in monotone function problems involving dependence.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.