Paper detail

Inference for changepoint survival models

We consider a non-proportional hazards model where the regression coefficient is not constant but piecewise constant. Following Andersen and Gill (1982), we know that a knowledge of the changepoint leads to a relatively straightforward estimation of the regression coefficients on either side of the changepoint. Between adjacent changepoints, we place ourselves under the proportional hazards model. We can then maximize the partial likelihood to obtain a consistent estimation of the regression coefficients. Difficulties occur when we want to estimate these changepoints. We obtain a confidence region for the changepoint, under a two-step regression model (Anderson and Senthilselvan, 1982), based on the work of Davies (1977). Then we introduce a new estimation method using the standardized score process (Chauvel and O'Quigley, 2014), under a model with multiple changepoints. In this context, rather than make use of the partial likelihood, we base inference on minimization of quadratic residuals. Simulations and an example are provided.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.