BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

John O'Quigley

John O'Quigley appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
ApplicationsMethodology

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works
2topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Conditional survival given covariates and marginal survival

Assuming some regression model, it is common to study the conditional distribution of survival given covariates. Here, we consider the impact of further conditioning, specifically conditioning on a marginal survival function, known or estimated. We investigate to what purposes any such information can be used in a proportional or non-proportional hazards regression analysis of time on the covariates. It does not lead to any improvement in efficiency when the form of the assumed proportional hazards model is valid. However, when the proportional hazards model is not valid, the usual partial likelihood estimator is not consistent and depends heavily on the unknown censoring mechanism. In this case we show that the conditional estimate that we propose is consistent for a parameter that has a strong interpretation independent of censoring. Simulations and examples are provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Inference for changepoint survival models

We consider a non-proportional hazards model where the regression coefficient is not constant but piecewise constant. Following Andersen and Gill (1982), we know that a knowledge of the changepoint leads to a relatively straightforward estimation of the regression coefficients on either side of the changepoint. Between adjacent changepoints, we place ourselves under the proportional hazards model. We can then maximize the partial likelihood to obtain a consistent estimation of the regression coefficients. Difficulties occur when we want to estimate these changepoints. We obtain a confidence region for the changepoint, under a two-step regression model (Anderson and Senthilselvan, 1982), based on the work of Davies (1977). Then we introduce a new estimation method using the standardized score process (Chauvel and O'Quigley, 2014), under a model with multiple changepoints. In this context, rather than make use of the partial likelihood, we base inference on minimization of quadratic residuals. Simulations and an example are provided.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Survival model construction guided by fit and predictive strength

We describe a unified framework within which we can build survival models. The motivation for this work comes from a study on the prediction of relapse among breast cancer patients treated at the Curie Institute in Paris, France. Our focus is on how to best code, or characterize, the effects of the variables, either alone or in combination with others. We consider simple graphical techniques that not only provide an immediate indication as to the goodness of fit but, in cases of departure from model assumptions, point in the direction of a more involved alternative model. These techniques help support our intuition. This intuition is backed up by formal theorems that underlie the process of building richer models from simpler ones. Goodness-of-fit techniques are used alongside measures of predictive strength and, again, formal theorems show that these measures can be used to help identify models closest to the unknown non-proportional hazards mechanism that we can suppose generates the observations. We consider many examples and show how these tools can be of help in guiding the practical problem of efficient model construction for survival data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Continual Reassessment and Related Dose-Finding Designs

During the last twenty years there have been considerable methodological developments in the design and analysis of Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 1/2 dose-finding studies. Many of these developments are related to the continual reassessment method (CRM), first introduced by O'Quigley, Pepe and Fisher (\citeyearQPF1990). CRM models have proven themselves to be of practical use and, in this discussion, we investigate the basic approach, some connections to other methods, some generalizations, as well as further applications of the model. We obtain some new results which can provide guidance in practice.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access