Paper detail

Inference and testing for structural change in time series of counts model

We consider here together the inference questions and the change-point problem in Poisson autoregressions (see Tjøstheim, 2012). The conditional mean (or intensity) of the process is involved as a non-linear function of it past values and the past observations. Under Lipschitz-type conditions, it is shown that the conditional mean can be written as a function of lagged observations. In the latter model, assume that the link function depends on an unknown parameter $θ_0$. The consistency and the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator of the parameter are proved. These results are used to study change-point problem in the parameter $θ_0$. We propose two tests based on the likelihood of the observations. Under the null hypothesis (i.e. no change), it is proved that both those test statistics converge to an explicit distribution. Consistencies under alternatives are proved for both tests. Simulation results show how those procedure work practically, and an application to real data is also processed.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.