Paper detail

Inert Higgs extension of the NMSSM

We introduce one pair of inert Higgs doublets {H_d, H_u} and singlets {N^c, N}, and consider their couplings with the Higgs doublets of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM), W \supset y_N N^c h_u H_d + y_N' N h_d H_u. We assign extra U(1)_{Z'} gauge charges only to the extra vector-like superfields, and so all the MSSM superfields remain neutral under the new U(1)_{Z'}. They can be an extension of the "λterm," W \supset λS h_u h_d in the next-to-MSSM (NMSSM). Due to the U(1)_{Z'}, the maximally allowed low energy value of y_N can be lifted up to 0.85, avoiding a Landau-pole (LP) below the grand unification scale. Such colorless vector-like superfields remarkably enhance the radiative MSSM Higgs mass particularly for large tanβthrough the y_N term and the corresponding holomorphic soft term. As a result, the lower bound of λand the upper bound of tanβcan be relaxed to disappear from the restricted parameter space of the original NMSSM, 0.6 < λ< 0.7 and 1< tanβ< 3. Thus, the valid parameter space significantly expands up to 0 < λ< 0.7, 0 < y_N < 0.85, and 2 < tanβ< 50, evading the LP problem and also explaining the 126 GeV Higgs mass naturally.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.