Paper detail

Indirect measurement of the $\pmb{(n,γ)^{127}}$Sb cross section

Nuclei in the $^{135}$I region have been identified as being a possible bottleneck for the \textit{i} process. Here we present an indirect measurement for the Maxwellian-averaged cross section of $^{126}\text{Sb}(n,γ)$. The nuclear level density and the $γ$-ray strength function of $^{127}$Sb have been extracted from $^{124}$Sn$(α,pγ)^{127}$Sb data using the Oslo method. The level density in the low-excitation-energy region agrees well with known discrete levels, and the higher-excitation-energy region follows an exponential curve compatible with the constant-temperature model. The strength function between $E_γ\approx$ 1.5-8.0 MeV presents several features, such as an upbend and a possibly double-peaked pygmy-like structure. None of the theoretical models included in the nuclear reaction code TALYS seem to reproduce the experimental data. The Maxwellian-averaged cross section for the $^{126}$Sb$(n,γ)^{127}$Sb reaction has been experimentally constrained by using our level-density and strength-function data as input to TALYS. We observe a good agreement with the JINA REACLIB, TENDL, and BRUSLIB libraries, while the ENDF/B-VIII.0 library predicts a significantly higher rate than our results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access17 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.