Paper detail

Increasing hazard rate of mixtures for natural exponential families

Hazard rates play an important role in various areas, e.g., reliability theory, survival analysis, biostatistics, queueing theory and actuarial studies. Mixtures of distributions are also of a great preeminence in such areas as most populations of components are indeed heterogeneous. In this study we present a sufficient condition for mixtures of two elements\ of the same natural exponential family (NEF) to have an increasing hazard rate. We then apply this condition to some classical NEF's having either quadratic, or cubic variance functions (VF) and others as well. A particular attention is devoted to the hyperbolic cosine NEF having a quadratic VF, the Ressel NEF having a cubic VF and to the Kummer distributions of type 2 NEF. The application of such a sufficient condition is quite intricate and cumbersome, in particular when applied to the latter three NEF's. Various lemmas and propositions are needed then to verify this condition for these NEF's.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.