Paper detail

Incorporation of Sparsity Information in Large-scale Multiple Two-sample $t$ Tests

Large-scale multiple two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ testing problems often arise from the statistical analysis of scientific data. To detect components with different values between two mean vectors, a well-known procedure is to apply the Benjamini and Hochberg (B-H) method and two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ statistics to control the false discovery rate (FDR). In many applications, mean vectors are expected to be sparse or asymptotically sparse. When dealing with such type of data, {\em can we gain more power than the standard procedure such as the B-H method with Student's $t$ statistics while keeping the FDR under control?} The answer is positive. By exploiting the possible sparsity information in mean vectors, we present an uncorrelated screening-based (US) FDR control procedure, which is shown to be more powerful than the B-H method. The US testing procedure depends on a novel construction of screening statistics, which are asymptotically uncorrelated with two-sample {\em Student}'s $t$ statistics. The US testing procedure is different from some existing {\em testing following screening} methods (Reiner, et al., 2007; Yekutieli, 2008) in which independence between screening and testing is crucial to control the FDR, while the independence often requires additional data or splitting of samples. An inappropriate splitting of samples may result in a loss rather than an improvement of statistical power. Instead, the uncorrelated screening US is based on the original data and does not need to split the samples. Theoretical results show that the US testing procedure controls the desired FDR asymptotically. Numerical studies are conducted and indicate that the proposed procedure works quite well.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.