Paper detail

Inconsistency of QED in the Presence of Dirac Monopoles II

We enlarge the local gauge invariance of QED from $~U(1)_A~$ to $~U(1)_A \times U(1)_Θ~$ by introducing another unphysical pure gauge field $~Θ~$ with an independent, unphysical gauge coupling $~\tilde{e}~$. This pure gauge field can be gauge-transformed away and the resulting theory is {\it identical to} standard QED. We then re-examine the Dirac quantization condition (DQC) for point monopoles and find that two essentially different DQCs can be derived. One DQC involves a gauge coupling $~e~$ in the $~U(1)_A~$ group and the other only the unphysical gauge coupling $~\tilde{e}~$ in the $~U(1)_Θ~$ group. The unique physically consistent solution of these two DQCs is a vanishing magnetic charge, which implies that no Dirac monopole exists in nature.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.