Paper detail

Incompressibility estimates for the Laughlin phase, part II

We consider fractional quantum Hall states built on Laughlin's original N-body wave-functions, i.e., they are of the form holomorphic times gaussian and vanish when two particles come close, with a given polynomial rate. Such states appear naturally when looking for the ground state of 2D particles in strong magnetic fields, interacting via repulsive forces and subject to an external potential due to trapping and/or disorder. We prove that all functions in this class satisfy a universal local density upper bound, in a suitable weak sense. Such bounds are useful to investigate the response of fractional quantum Hall phases to variations of the external potential. Contrary to our previous results for a restricted class of wave-functions, the bound we obtain here is not optimal, but it does not require any additional assumptions on the wave-function, besides analyticity and symmetry of the pre-factor modifying the Laughlin function.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.